Need help Identifying minnows
#1 Guest_perci4me_*
Posted 26 June 2010 - 11:16 PM
P6261859comp.JPG 33.3KB 1 downloads
I am almost certain this might be some type of Sucker or Stoneroller, although I am beginning to thing it is neither. Collected from Fox Creek, Schoharie, NY
P6261860comp.JPG 33.16KB 0 downloads
I think I have this narrowed down to either a Blacknose Dace or a Western Blacknose Dace. Collected from an Unnamed creek outside of Polkville, NY
P6261866comp.JPG 34.89KB 0 downloads
I think this might be a Longnose Dace. Collected from Fox Creek, Schoharie, NY
The last two pics are of a unidentified pygmy sunfish that was given to me after a friend of mine went collecting near his home in Florida. I have done some research but nothing comes up as conclusive, so I figured Id post them on here to see if anyone can ID it:
P6261867comp.JPG 43.61KB 0 downloads
P6261871comp.JPG 36.4KB 0 downloads
Thanks in advance to anyone who can help me with this. I like to know exactly what I have for future research purposes.
#2 Guest_MrCatfish_*
Posted 26 June 2010 - 11:35 PM
#3 Guest_bumpylemon_*
Posted 27 June 2010 - 07:35 AM
just a heads up...the DEC there will ticket you if they see you fishing for other than bait. they will not let you remove wildlife. it breaks their laws.
Edited by bumpylemon, 27 June 2010 - 07:44 AM.
#4 Guest_bumpylemon_*
Posted 27 June 2010 - 07:45 AM
#5 Guest_fundulus_*
Posted 27 June 2010 - 08:23 AM
#6 Guest_bumpylemon_*
Posted 27 June 2010 - 08:32 AM
yeah i agree. i didnt wanna be the guy to tell him that he didnt get a nice pygmy fish but a bluegill lolThe sunfish look(s) like juvenile bluegill.
#7 Guest_sandtiger_*
Posted 27 June 2010 - 08:49 AM
The first one looks like white sucker,second one eastern blacknose dace, third longnose dace. I'm not sure on the sunfish.
I agree on all three of these and the sunfish I am also unsure of but am leaning towards bluegill.
#8 Guest_MrCatfish_*
Posted 27 June 2010 - 10:36 AM
#9 Guest_bumpylemon_*
Posted 27 June 2010 - 10:50 AM
#10 Guest_perci4me_*
Posted 27 June 2010 - 10:17 PM
#11 Guest_scottefontay_*
Posted 28 June 2010 - 11:20 AM
You may want to read up on the NYS regs. No transporting fish by motor vehicle and no captive keeping.
#12 Guest_bumpylemon_*
Posted 28 June 2010 - 11:44 AM
yup...we found that out first hand earlier this month. which really stinks for you NYers. I did however go back there last thursday to do some bass fishing and to take photos. I found another spot that had 5 -7 mudminnows per dipnet and 6-10 brook sticklebacks per net. i took pictures and released. also i caught some nice HUGE spot fins.http://forum.nanfa.o...__0
You may want to read up on the NYS regs. No transporting fish by motor vehicle and no captive keeping.
#13 Guest_perci4me_*
Posted 28 June 2010 - 10:11 PM
http://forum.nanfa.o...__0
You may want to read up on the NYS regs. No transporting fish by motor vehicle and no captive keeping.
Upon looking at it and going off of personal collecting experience, I can say this much. I truly appreciate that there are laws like this to preserve conservation efforts as I am highly active in the conservation group Fish Ark Mexico that works to conserve and study native livebearer species and can fully appreciate this. However, in the posted link it is mentioned that conservation officers and fishermen alike need to be educated in identifying native populations. I can almost guarantee that if one was to be slick about it, he could A: Simply say that the fish that he/she is using for bait is an approved specie, and not what it really is and B: Be really quick and nondescript about collecting anything. I understand that this seems almost shady, but in all reality, the people who are collecting are the ones who give a damn about conservation and appreciate the native species, not to mention they can properly ID them, unlike the Feds can. Being able to properly ID them also gives us, the natural hobbyist, an advantage. It allows us to identify rare or endangered species so that we don't remove them, such as the Gilt Darter. My argument might come across as hypocritical given that I placed this post to ID the fish I caught, but typically I ID them in the field, and did not have the time this time around. More so, I always carry books to help me ID as best I can before removing any species from their natural habitat. With the exception of the White Sucker I caught, I have been successful at judging whether or not a fish is suitable to remove from the location and know ahead of time how to maintain them in a enclosed environment. Which brings me to the question that hasn't been answered really... Has anyone actually run into the DEC while collecting in NYS, and what was the outcome, etc...
#14 Guest_sandtiger_*
Posted 28 June 2010 - 10:19 PM
Which brings me to the question that hasn't been answered really... Has anyone actually run into the DEC while collecting in NYS, and what was the outcome, etc...
I collect fairly often and go fishing a lot and in the decade or so I've been actively doing it I've only encountered an officer three times, all while fishing. He just asked to see my licence at that was it.
#15 Guest_bumpylemon_*
Posted 28 June 2010 - 10:20 PM
Upon looking at it and going off of personal collecting experience, I can say this much. I truly appreciate that there are laws like this to preserve conservation efforts as I am highly active in the conservation group Fish Ark Mexico that works to conserve and study native livebearer species and can fully appreciate this. However, in the posted link it is mentioned that conservation officers and fishermen alike need to be educated in identifying native populations. I can almost guarantee that if one was to be slick about it, he could A: Simply say that the fish that he/she is using for bait is an approved specie, and not what it really is and B: Be really quick and nondescript about collecting anything. I understand that this seems almost shady, but in all reality, the people who are collecting are the ones who give a damn about conservation and appreciate the native species, not to mention they can properly ID them, unlike the Feds can. Being able to properly ID them also gives us, the natural hobbyist, an advantage. It allows us to identify rare or endangered species so that we don't remove them, such as the Gilt Darter. My argument might come across as hypocritical given that I placed this post to ID the fish I caught, but typically I ID them in the field, and did not have the time this time around. More so, I always carry books to help me ID as best I can before removing any species from their natural habitat. With the exception of the White Sucker I caught, I have been successful at judging whether or not a fish is suitable to remove from the location and know ahead of time how to maintain them in a enclosed environment. Which brings me to the question that hasn't been answered really... Has anyone actually run into the DEC while collecting in NYS, and what was the outcome, etc...
yes me and 3 other members were stopped on June 6th in Schoharie. again i will say to much info was given...we could have and should have said "bait fish" but that didnt happen. we had to dump all our collected fish and one member was ticketed for "intending" to keep wildlife as a pet or something along those lines.
Edited by bumpylemon, 28 June 2010 - 10:21 PM.
#16 Guest_fundulus_*
Posted 28 June 2010 - 10:22 PM
#17 Guest_perci4me_*
Posted 28 June 2010 - 10:32 PM
yes me and 3 other members were stopped on June 6th in Schoharie. again i will say to much info was given...we could have and should have said "bait fish" but that didnt happen. we had to dump all our collected fish and one member was ticketed for "intending" to keep wildlife as a pet or something along those lines.
Without saying anything about the NY DEC which I know little about, I will say that any Feds you encounter in a conservation/endangered species context will usually know about species and be able to identify them. But in most cases they're not the ones who will question you about seining fish in a third-order creek, certainly in the East.
Wow, very interesting answers. Thank you. I see a lot of "could of, would of, should of", and in the same situation I most likely would have run into the same thing if I was caught of guard. I'm in the Air Force, so I cant risk any run in's with the law, or risk loosing a stripe. Bumpylemon, did either you or the two other members have a fishing license on you when you were caught? I also have to agree with fundulus, in that the ones who can identify the fish are not the ones who are going to question you, but then again, bumpylemon, was the officer who stopped you able to properly ID the fish you had before he made any assumptions?
#18 Guest_bumpylemon_*
Posted 28 June 2010 - 10:37 PM
He didnt need to I'd anything because at the time we innocently thought with a regular fishing license we were within the law so we had said "collecting bait fish for the aquarium". That's all he needed. Was the intent to leavwe the creek with a motor vehicle with bait fish.Wow, very interesting answers. Thank you. I see a lot of "could of, would of, should of", and in the same situation I most likely would have run into the same thing if I was caught of guard. I'm in the Air Force, so I cant risk any run in's with the law, or risk loosing a stripe. Bumpylemon, did either you or the two other members have a fishing license on you when you were caught? I also have to agree with fundulus, in that the ones who can identify the fish are not the ones who are going to question you, but then again, bumpylemon, was the officer who stopped you able to properly ID the fish you had before he made any assumptions?
#19 Guest_perci4me_*
Posted 28 June 2010 - 10:43 PM
He didnt need to I'd anything because at the time we innocently thought with a regular fishing license we were within the law so we had said "collecting bait fish for the aquarium". That's all he needed. Was the intent to leavwe the creek with a motor vehicle with bait fish.
Understandable...
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users