
Scud Safe Pumps
#1
Guest_mywan_*
Posted 18 January 2011 - 09:42 AM
Basically the concern I have is the pump killing any scuds, rotifers, daphnia, etc., that pass through it. I would like to choose a pump that minimizes killing of microfauna but can't find any information on this.
#2
Guest_EricaWieser_*
Posted 18 January 2011 - 12:33 PM
Here are some photo examples of the sponge filter system most aquarists find effective:
http://www.fishyrevi...nk001_large.jpg
http://www.discusfis...06/IMG_6860.jpg
#3
Guest_smilingfrog_*
Posted 18 January 2011 - 12:43 PM
Keeping small organisms from being killed by pumps is more about the filtering layers you have on the intakes for the pumps than on the pumps themselves. If you cover the pump's intake with a four inch cylinder of sponge, then the small water dwellers will have a much easier time of keeping themselves from being sucked in.
Here are some photo examples of the sponge filter system most aquarists find effective:
http://www.fishyrevi...nk001_large.jpg
http://www.discusfis...06/IMG_6860.jpg
Those would keep scuds and other strong swimmers/crawlers out, but I would think something like daphnia would wind up stuck to the sponge.
#4
Guest_countrybumpkin_*
Posted 18 January 2011 - 03:15 PM
#5
Guest_Newt_*
Posted 18 January 2011 - 04:12 PM
#6
Guest_gerald_*
Posted 18 January 2011 - 04:28 PM
Edited by gerald, 18 January 2011 - 04:30 PM.
#7
Guest_mikez_*
Posted 18 January 2011 - 05:34 PM
When you do use media, you have a built in refugium. In fact I have had mad colonies of scud survive for years in a Magnum in which I never changed the sleeve. Sure, flow was reduced, but the scuds ate enough of the detritus to allow significant flow through. This in a tank full of predators that would never allow scuds to survive.
I've also had huge snail colonies survive inside magnums and even had rainwater killie fry survive and grow inside them.
Most of the centrifigal pumps like Little Giants allow quite large particles to pass through. Again, this assumes you DO NOT use a prefilter. Obviously prefilters will keep critters and everything else out, but then you're a slave to keeping your prefilter clean or clogging steals your flow.
#8
Guest_mikez_*
Posted 18 January 2011 - 06:05 PM
What I like about the magnum is the selfcontained, self priming, flood proof design [opposite of sump based wet/dry and varients]. As a primary filter the significant drawback is small media surface and quick clogging. My suggested use is different from the manufacturer suggested. Lots of stuff online to read using what I gave as a jumping off point.
Edited by mikez, 18 January 2011 - 06:06 PM.
#9
Guest_mywan_*
Posted 18 January 2011 - 07:37 PM
Here's an outline, subject to change, of the situation. The only prefilter will be where the water exits in the bottom right side of the fishtank in the palladium. Hopefully excluding scuds etc. colonies from passing here. From here the water travels outside the house to a large (bypassable) reservoir. Then goes through the actual pump and return to a planted swamp region (if waterfall is bypassed) on the left side of the aquarium. If the waterfall bypass is turned off it'll pass over the indoor waterfall for increased evaporative cooling and into the planted swamp. It overflows this swamp into a bioball filter which exits into the bottom of the tank on the left side. This keeps the swiftest water near the bottom of the tank with stepped sides to provide low flow (low turbulence) regions for fish that prefer it.
The sources of protected scud (etc.) colonies is the planted swamp, bioball filter, and external reservoir. The reservoir colonies is the main concern in this setup. With the water fall bypassed there will be no significant water level differential. With pumps off the system water level will equalize inside and out, but I need enough head pressure to sometimes operate a waterfall of a couple of feet. If I move the pump to between the prefiltered aquarium exit and the reservoir then, unless the reservoir is bypassed, there is no way to get the head pressure needed to operate the waterfall. Even without the waterfall there is the danger of losing aquarium water level to maintain the water level difference needed to keep the water flow up. I can use a venturi effect to alleviate this but I don't want to make it so complex it's like driving a car from day to day.
Much better if the pump is after the reservoir, with the possibility of a venturi in the reservoir to self regulate the aquarium water level as water is lost to evaporation. The order in which water passes from one region to another is important. The planted swamp needs the CO2 and nutrients from the fish before passing through the biofilter, which is basically a biofilter in its own right. The water then needs to pass through the biofilter before entering the fish tank. The extensive micro/macro fauna colonies is ideally intended to make the food chain self sufficient, at least in principle. Thus I want to minimize damage to these colonies by the pump, the primary concern here being from the reservoir tank.
#10
Guest_mywan_*
Posted 18 January 2011 - 07:49 PM
I don't need the pump to also filter.
Edited by mywan, 18 January 2011 - 07:50 PM.
#11
Guest_mywan_*
Posted 18 January 2011 - 08:35 PM
The water exiting the aquarium is the point at which the planktonic colonies are prefiltered, making it the safest point to add the pump. Rather than then going to the external (bypassable) reservoir simply skip the reservoir altogether in the pump loop. Then add a separate gravity feed line from the reservoir to the tank, with a controllable valve to maintain the aquarium water level. The reservoir can then be maintained with a higher water level, providing for a controlled gravity feed.
This should solve my main concerns, but I still prefer a pump that minimizes damage to microfauna colonies that may get through the prefilter.
Here is a basic outline, subject to change, of the floor view and front view.
Top floor view:

Front view palladium:

#12
Guest_Moontanman_*
Posted 01 February 2011 - 08:22 PM
#13
Guest_mywan_*
Posted 02 February 2011 - 10:29 AM
It may seem like a bubbler does not produce significant turbulence, but in fact the physics of bubbles results in a rather extreme 'effective' turbulence. It may not be as extreme as that described in sonoluminescence, but it is more than sufficient to drive the dissolved gas levels down very quickly. I could qualitatively describe the physics of why bubbles do this, same basic reason divers get the bends, when very fast flowing water (laminar flows) does not necessarily, but the point is that bubbles is something I want to avoid. Opting instead for other methods of increasing water surface area.
Even the fast flow region at the bottom of the tank is designed to prevent turbulent flows, and give the fish the choice of what flow rates they are comfortable with in the tank, simply by changing where they hang out. The floor will be contoured to facilitate this flow.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users