
What's the smallest fish?
#2
Guest_mneilson_*
Posted 28 January 2011 - 03:55 PM
It is most definitely not true. H. formosa maxes out at ~3.5 cm TL, but there are several genera of gobies/infantfish that are much smaller (e.g., Trimma, Trimmatom, Schindleria all have max TL of <= 2 cm). Elassoma seem to range around H. formosa: E. gilberti has a max TL of ~2.5 cm, whereas E. zonatum is ~4.5 cm.I recently saw someone claim that heterandria formosa was the seventh smallest fish in the world. Is that true? If so, then where do the fish of the elassoma genus rank? Are elassoma gilberti smaller? Is Dario dario smaller? Help?
Edited by mneilson, 28 January 2011 - 03:56 PM.
#3
Guest_Newt_*
Posted 28 January 2011 - 09:26 PM
There are also a number of tiny southeast Asian danionine cyprinids, such as Danionella, Microrasbora, Microdevario, Boraras, Celestichthys, and the famous acid-swamp midget Paedocypris, claimed to be the world's smallest vertebrate at a max TL of barely over 1 cm (10.3 mm). Some of the gobies mneilson mentioned may be even smaller. The smallest killies, including Oryzias minutillus and North America's own Leptolucania ommata, are similar in size to H. formosa, as are some very small tetras, such as Hyphessobrycon amandae.
#4
Guest_mneilson_*
Posted 28 January 2011 - 10:03 PM
I would be astonished to see a 4.5 cm Elassoma!
I've not seen this myself...just basing this off info from FishBase.
This debate about the smallest seems to center around the smallest sexually mature individuals found. Schindleria brevipinguis is sexually mature at ~8 mm, and maxes out at ~ 8.5 mm TL, but sexually mature Paedocypris have been found at 7.9 mm.There are also a number of tiny southeast Asian danionine cyprinids, such as Danionella, Microrasbora, Microdevario, Boraras, Celestichthys, and the famous acid-swamp midget Paedocypris, claimed to be the world's smallest vertebrate at a max TL of barely over 1 cm (10.3 mm). Some of the gobies mneilson mentioned may be even smaller.
#8
Guest_Newt_*
Posted 29 January 2011 - 02:53 PM
#11
Guest_mywan_*
Posted 29 January 2011 - 08:36 PM
http://www.killienut....php?extend.2.1
Ichthyol. Explor. Freshwaters, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 63-72, 3 figs., 1 tab., March 2010
An overview of North America’s diminutive freshwater fish fauna
Micah G. Bennett* and Kevin W. Conway*
Based on a review of the literature, we compile a table of North American freshwater fishes with maximum standard length (SL) less than or equal to 50 mm and information on size at sexual maturity. Using previously published criteria for miniature fishes (< 26 mm maximum SL, or those that mature at SL < 20 mm), we found evidence for seven miniature fishes on the North American continent: Elassoma alabamae, E. zonatum, Leptolucania ommata, Heterandria formosa, Megupsilon aporus, Cyprinodon macularius and Notropis saladonis, the smallest being E. alabamae (Spring Pygmy Sunfish, maximum size 25.5 mm SL). We compare the number of miniature species in North America to those from Africa, South Asia and South America and discuss patterns of distribution, habitat preference and imperilment amongst North America’s smallest freshwater fishes.
Here you can read the first page of the introduction and ordering information if you want the article (PDF):
http://www.pfeil-ver.../ief21_1_05.pdf
#15
Guest_EricaWieser_*
Posted 02 February 2011 - 07:25 PM
Top five smallest North American fish by maximum standard length:
1. Elassoma alabamae, 25.5 mm
2. Notropis calbazas, 26.8 mm
3. Elassoma boehlkei, 27 mm
4. Leptolucania ommata, 27 mm
5. Characodon garmani, 27 mm
Keeping in mind that heterandria formosa is listed at 30 mm, with like ten species smaller than it. Neat. Thank you for the paper suggestion.

Edited by EricaWieser, 02 February 2011 - 07:35 PM.
#17
Guest_smbass_*
Posted 02 February 2011 - 11:52 PM
#18
Guest_EricaWieser_*
Posted 03 February 2011 - 10:46 AM
Etheostoma microperca: 37 mm . . . . . . . Source paper: Etnier and Starnes, 1993
Etheostoma tippecannoe: 36 mm . . . . . . . Source paper: Stauffer and Van Sink, 1997., Warren et al. 1986
Edited by EricaWieser, 03 February 2011 - 10:50 AM.
#19
Guest_mywan_*
Posted 23 April 2011 - 07:43 AM
I did find this:
http://nanofish.info/fish/index.php
But is is not just natives but all nanofish less than 35 mm worldwide suitable for aquarium. They are not listed in size order either.
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users