Jump to content


Rosyface vs Tennessee Shiner


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Guest_itsme_*

Guest_itsme_*
  • Guests

Posted 31 May 2011 - 09:06 AM

Does anyone have a reliable way of separating Notropis rubellus from Notropis leuciodus without killing (or stressing) them? I am looking at specimens from Copper Creek, Virginia, Clinch/Tennessee River drainage.

Thanks!

#2 Guest_gerald_*

Guest_gerald_*
  • Guests

Posted 31 May 2011 - 09:42 AM

Rubellus: 9-11 (usually 10)anal rays, dorsal origin distinctly posterior to pelvic origin, faint or no gold stripe above dark lateral stripe.
Leuciodus: 7-9 (usually 8 ) anal rays, dorsal origin directly above or barely posterior to pelvic origin, distinct gold stripe above dark lateral stripe.
A back-lit photo may work for counting anal rays. The Tennessee basin "rubellus" are now "micropteryx". The Ohio/New R are the true rubellus.... and dont forget to consider N.photogenis too.

Does anyone have a reliable way of separating Notropis rubellus from Notropis leuciodus without killing (or stressing) them? I am looking at specimens from Copper Creek, Virginia, Clinch/Tennessee River drainage.

Thanks!


Edited by gerald, 31 May 2011 - 09:42 AM.


#3 Guest_ashtonmj_*

Guest_ashtonmj_*
  • Guests

Posted 31 May 2011 - 09:42 AM

Do they have a dark caudal spot? Is the lateral line HEAVILY stitched? Where is the dorsal fin origin in relation to the pelciv fin origin?

#4 Guest_itsme_*

Guest_itsme_*
  • Guests

Posted 31 May 2011 - 10:21 AM

Rubellus: 9-11 (usually 10)anal rays, dorsal origin distinctly posterior to pelvic origin, faint or no gold stripe above dark lateral stripe.
Leuciodus: 7-9 (usually 8 ) anal rays, dorsal origin directly above or barely posterior to pelvic origin, distinct gold stripe above dark lateral stripe.
A back-lit photo may work for counting anal rays. The Tennessee basin "rubellus" are now "micropteryx". The Ohio/New R are the true rubellus.... and dont forget to consider N.photogenis too.



That sounds do-able. Thanks, Gerald! Still pretty subtle, though. The NANFA Forum: Where the experts hang out! :biggrin:

I think I can pick out photogenis pretty well. So micropteryx is now a described species? Can you give me a citation to look up? Thanks!

#5 Guest_itsme_*

Guest_itsme_*
  • Guests

Posted 31 May 2011 - 10:24 AM

Do they have a dark caudal spot? Is the lateral line HEAVILY stitched? Where is the dorsal fin origin in relation to the pelciv fin origin?


Oh, yeah, I guess rubellus doesn't really have the caudal spot, huh? Stitching too, that's good. I was going to go on fin origins, but Freshwater Fishes of Virginia seemed to indicate that this was quite variable and maybe not reliable. Thanks, Matt! Experts indeed!

#6 Guest_tricolor_*

Guest_tricolor_*
  • Guests

Posted 31 May 2011 - 03:45 PM

slightly off topic but what is the external difference between micropteryx and rubellus? Any breeding color difference?

Edited by tricolor, 31 May 2011 - 03:45 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users