Rosyface Shiner?
#1 Guest_BenCantrell_*
Posted 18 June 2012 - 05:08 PM
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
#2 Guest_Orangespotted_*
Posted 18 June 2012 - 06:48 PM
Rosyfaces will have a wide lateral band, sharp snout, and their snout is longer than the diameter of their eye (tried to measure this out but it's really tough to tell if it's even or just a smidge bigger).
Emeralds will have a very faint lateral band, blunter snouth, and snout equal or less than diameter of the eye.
I hope somebody else knows a better way to differentiate the two, my book isn't very helpful. I'm going to say that the stream surveyers were probably capable of telling whether they were Rosyface or Emerald so I think they were correct. On the other hand, we can't be certain that every single fisherman has been responsible and avoided dumping out their bait buckets there.
Edited by Orangespotted, 18 June 2012 - 06:50 PM.
#3 Guest_jblaylock_*
Posted 18 June 2012 - 09:09 PM
#4 Guest_Uland_*
Posted 18 June 2012 - 10:12 PM
I believe your first fish looks pretty much like Carmine shiners I see often in the Kankakee river tribs. Emerald vs. Carmine is difficult until you spend some time with them. I generally look at the head shape when comparing the two and even then, it takes time (try and catch many of both in the same day to help). In my opinion, local carmine shiners tend to have a slightly less convex forehead whereas emerald shiners have a handgun "bullet" shaped head. Local Carmine shiners have a more slender body shape and acutely angled head. On local Carmine shiners, the eye is usually more rearward on the head giving them a little shnoz. Honestly your fish lack the "schnoz" look I'm used to seeing but still think they're carmine.
The second fish looks looks like it might be an exhausted spawned out male and the first looks like a spawned out female.
Josh, no N photogenis here...thank goodness we don't have all three in the same water, I'd spend far too much time hunched over the net!
Edited by Uland, 18 June 2012 - 10:15 PM.
#5 Guest_fundulus_*
Posted 18 June 2012 - 10:38 PM
#6 Guest_BenCantrell_*
Posted 18 June 2012 - 11:30 PM
#7 Guest_NateTessler13_*
Posted 20 June 2012 - 05:52 AM
They look to be too small to be photogenis, and there's no obvious nasal halfmoon marks.
Young photogenis and young rubellus/percobromus are difficult for me to differentiate. I'm always looking for the half-moons and they never seem "obvious" on younger fish. My first thought when I saw the fish in this thread was photogenis, but if you're outside their range, they've got to be percobromus.
#8 Guest_BenCantrell_*
Posted 20 June 2012 - 08:23 AM
#9 Guest_Drew_*
Posted 20 June 2012 - 09:53 AM
I'm starting to think that a shiner aquarium would be a good idea to help me develop my ID skills. Something like 2 of each of 4 or 5 species in a 30 gallon aquarium.
There is nothing better than going into the field and observing them especially when they aren't colored up.
#10 Guest_gerald_*
Posted 20 June 2012 - 10:20 AM
There is nothing better than going into the field and observing them especially when they aren't colored up.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users