http://en.wikipedia....ki/Pirate_perch
Was that created by someone here?
Who creates "stuff" as linked below
Started by
centrarchid
, Dec 04 2014 05:04 PM
6 replies to this topic
#3
Michael Wolfe
-
- Board of Directors
-
- North Georgia, Oconee River Drainage
Posted 04 December 2014 - 07:07 PM
Not us... maybe someone should delete the whole thing and just post a link to our Fish in Focus
http://www.nanfa.org...rateperch.shtml
http://www.nanfa.org...rateperch.shtml
Either write something worth reading or do something worth writing. - Benjamin Franklin
#4
gerald
-
- Global Moderator
- Wake Forest, North Carolina
Posted 05 December 2014 - 12:01 PM
It's not elegant writing, but what exactly is false? OK, so breeding season and trans-branchi-oral egg/sperm delivery could have been explained better, and wild diet vs captive diet could have been separated (wild fish probably don't eat mealworms), ...
I don't know who wrote it. Wikipedia CAN be a good source of info if knowledgeable people who find errors fix them.
I don't know who wrote it. Wikipedia CAN be a good source of info if knowledgeable people who find errors fix them.
Gerald Pottern
-----------------------
Hangin' on the Neuse
"Taxonomy is the diaper used to organize the mess of evolution into discrete packages" - M.Sandel
#7
Matt DeLaVega
-
- Forum Staff
- Ohio
Posted 07 December 2014 - 12:30 PM
Often WIKI has several sentences written with a caption saying "citations needed". I have never tried to alter it so I do not know the protocol. I often use it for a first line reference before I delve deeper. Teachers and professors generally do not want to see wikipedia as a reference on a paper. Over the years, as more people have used it, it seems to have improved.
The member formerly known as Skipjack
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
NANFA Youtube Channel 
