Jump to content


Photo

Orangespotted sunfish prey/body type correlation


14 replies to this topic

#1 fishlvr

fishlvr
  • NANFA Guest
  • Savannah, GA

Posted 07 May 2015 - 09:45 PM

I recently read somewhere that when given different prey items during early development young O-spots will grow differently from other young that consume alternative prey items (i.e. stout bodies for one prey item, more streamlined bodies for other prey items). Just wondering if anybody had any papers regarding this or have any experience with this, and if this holds true for other sunfish sp as well. Sorry if my wording is confusing I've been at work all day and I have a 1 month old baby so I'm tired haha.
Steve Knight

Lower Ogeechee/Ogeechee Coastal Drainage

#2 Cu455

Cu455
  • NANFA Member

Posted 08 May 2015 - 08:24 AM

It sounds like Lamarks theory with giraffe necks, which isn't really excepted anymore. Nutrition might have some factor in color, muscle, bone and fat composition. Maybe it has something to do with that.

#3 UncleWillie

UncleWillie
  • NANFA Guest

Posted 08 May 2015 - 08:43 AM

This isn't with sunfishes, but I learned about this a while back about Lake Trout (Char).  The body morphology of these two distinct phenotypes is pretty amazing.  Pectoral fin size, mouth size and shape, etc. varied depending on where in the water column the fish live and forage (type and location).  One of the folks working on a similar project showed a group of us photos of all the trout they caught.  The differences between some of them were mind blowing.

http://csis.msu.edu/... Slave Lake.pdf


Willie Pruitt
Chattahoochee River, GA


#4 gerald

gerald
  • Global Moderator
  • Wake Forest, North Carolina

Posted 08 May 2015 - 11:32 AM

Lamarck's theory (now generally un-accepted) was that animals could pass on traits that they acquired during their lives, e.g. giraffes stretching their necks to reach the highest leaves.  What Steve and Willie are describing is "phenotypic plasticity" -- the ability to grow and develop differently in response to local environmental conditions.  Plants of course are the real masters of this.  It doesn't have to do with passing on acquired traits to the next generation like Lamarck's theory.   But in certain instances, Lamarck was sort of right -- some organisms really can incorporate and pass on genes acquired from others (but not by stretching their necks).

 

It sounds like Lamarks theory with giraffe necks, which isn't really excepted anymore. Nutrition might have some factor in color, muscle, bone and fat composition. Maybe it has something to do with that.


Gerald Pottern
-----------------------
Hangin' on the Neuse
"Taxonomy is the diaper used to organize the mess of evolution into discrete packages" - M.Sandel


#5 vang1709

vang1709
  • NANFA Guest

Posted 09 May 2015 - 08:58 PM

For those interested in Lamarkian ideas, check out Epigenetics. It's quite an interesting read.



#6 lilyea

lilyea
  • NANFA Member
  • Peace River Watershed, Central Florida, USA

Posted 09 May 2015 - 09:50 PM

From a related but slightly different angle, the article entitled: "Morphological change and phenotypic plasticity in native and non-native pumpkinseed sunfish in response to competition" by Yavno, Rook, and Fox (2014) proposes that competition affects body shape in Pumpkinseeds.  This difference would presumably also affect prey selection and/or availability.



#7 Cu455

Cu455
  • NANFA Member

Posted 12 June 2015 - 09:29 AM

It might be phenotypic plasticity, but there isn't really enough information to determine that. I am sure nutrition might have a slight effect on color and deposition, but nothing major. I might be wrong but I doubt fish will be noticeable different if you feed black worms vs bloodworms or NLS pellets vs Hakari pellets.

 

I skimmed through the trout article and think a lot of the traits are more genetic base then environmental. Part of the article mentioned the position of the mouth on trout. Trout found on the top have their mouth located on top because of genetics and the effects of natural selection. I doubt the position of the mouth will shift due to a change due to water depth. It is the position of the mouth that determines where they will be found in the water column and not the other way around. Some of the traits like color might be due to environmental changes.

 

In Lamarks writings he stated that organisms can change their body type to a certain extent. When he wrote about the giraffes he stated that a giraffe can extend his neck throughout his life time but is limited to how much he can extended. As generations go went the addition length kept getting passed down.



#8 centrarchid

centrarchid
  • NANFA Member

Posted 13 June 2015 - 10:54 AM

For those interested in Lamarkian ideas, check out Epigenetics. It's quite an interesting read.

This business is real.

 

Conditions I am familiar with that promote phenotypic plasticity involve physical activity such as handling large-tough versus small-delicate food items.  The epigenetics business, though real, seems to be overly played or at least not understood by much of genera public discussing it.


Find ways for people not already interested in natives to value them.

#9 Betta132

Betta132
  • NANFA Guest
  • San Gabriel drainage area

Posted 21 June 2015 - 01:42 PM

Perhaps it's due to a sort of survival-of-the-fittest thing. For example, if the majority of available prey items are fast and must be pursued, the naturally slender/fast sunfish babies would do better than the thick/strong ones, so you end up with lots of slender ones that outcompeted all the thick ones. Or vice versa, you get big thick sunnies if the available prey had to be thrashed around and killed. In an environment with lots of easily grabbed prey, you'd end up with a mix. 



#10 DPFW

DPFW
  • NANFA Guest

Posted 06 July 2015 - 10:37 AM

There was a paper out of the Wainwright lab look at feeding morphology (not body morphology, sorry) in pumpkinseed sunfish.  They found that it was mainly a result of phenotypic plasticity.

 

Here's the reference:

Mittelbach, Gary G., Craig W. Osenberg, and Peter C. Wainwright. "Variation in feeding morphology between pumpkinseed populations: phenotypic plasticity or evolution?." Evolutionary Ecology Research 1.1 (1999): 111-128.

 

I can send the actual paper if anyone wants it- just PM me.



#11 fundulus

fundulus
  • Global Moderator

Posted 07 July 2015 - 07:24 AM

Yeah, Mittelbach has done interesting work with others at the Michigan State Kellogg Station like EE Werner on Lepomis life history. One of many ways that the North American sunfishes are like cichlids is in the plasticity of their feeding morphology. Most fish are pretty opportunistic in their food habits, so it would make sense.
Bruce Stallsmith, Huntsville, Alabama, US of A

#12 Matt DeLaVega

Matt DeLaVega
  • Board of Directors
  • Ohio

Posted 07 July 2015 - 11:40 AM

I don't think this is very relative, but a bit maybe.

 

Apparently there are two populations of rainbow smelt in the great lakes, One spawns in streams, the other spawns on sandbars and shoals farther out in the lake. Both are the same species. It seems that in lake Erie that people are catching fewer and fewer smelt. They have targeted them during the spawning run for who knows how long. These anadromous populations seem to be dwindling, but the shoal spawners are doing fine. So there are still plenty of smelt. I assume this was nature's way of preserving the species through droughts or floods. It has been a while since I read about this, so I am sure I am missing some points, but I found it very interesting.

 

Along with the arctic char, I think there are several lakes in Eurasia? that have brown trout populations that though the same species, there are three different phenotypes that occupy three different niches.


The member formerly known as Skipjack


#13 fundulus

fundulus
  • Global Moderator

Posted 08 July 2015 - 07:35 AM

Something similar exists among what are now recognized separate species of Cyprinodon pupfishes on the Bahamian island of San Salvador. The saline lakes there have what appear to be three morphs, including the famous bozo morph, adapted to different ecological niches. They're also reproductively isolated. Threespine sticklebacks do many tricks like that too in both marine and freshwater systems.
Bruce Stallsmith, Huntsville, Alabama, US of A

#14 centrarchid

centrarchid
  • NANFA Member

Posted 08 July 2015 - 08:17 AM

Also Artic Charr.  The Ciscoe / Whitefish clan has also done it numerous times.


Find ways for people not already interested in natives to value them.

#15 MichiJim

MichiJim
  • NANFA Guest
  • Michigan Upper Peninsula

Posted 08 July 2015 - 09:07 AM

I am showing my age here, but I seem to remember something like this with yellow perch in the Great Lakes.  This would have been back in the early 1980's.  If I am remembering it correctly, it involved the abundance of mayfly larve.





Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users