Jump to content


Photo

Cuts to Federal Programs Related to Conservation


4 replies to this topic

#1 centrarchid

centrarchid
  • NANFA Member

Posted 26 February 2018 - 02:29 PM

Are you people seeing this?  I am getting a bad feeling.  My actions more generally of interest to the USDA and things are looking a little iffy there as well.


Find ways for people not already interested in natives to value them.

#2 mattknepley

mattknepley
  • NANFA Member
  • Smack-dab between the Savannah and the Saluda.

Posted 26 February 2018 - 05:19 PM

If the emails I get from my elected "representatives" are any indication, almost all conservation is pretty much in the crosshairs.
Matt Knepley
"No thanks, a third of a gopher would merely arouse my appetite..."

#3 fundulus

fundulus
  • Global Moderator

Posted 27 February 2018 - 08:07 AM

Yes, broad swathes of federal work to promote conservation along with clean air and water are under attack. Soon we'll hear that it's perfectly OK to dump coal ash in rivers, etc., at the rate we're going.
Bruce Stallsmith, Huntsville, Alabama, US of A

#4 centrarchid

centrarchid
  • NANFA Member

Posted 27 February 2018 - 09:46 AM

I am not sure my farmers are backing those changes.  Most actually interested in conservation.  It is others not coming into contact with natural resources.


Find ways for people not already interested in natives to value them.

#5 gerald

gerald
  • Global Moderator
  • Wake Forest, North Carolina

Posted 27 February 2018 - 01:07 PM

NC got rid of several important conservation-related tax incentives a few years ago.


Gerald Pottern
-----------------------
Hangin' on the Neuse
"Taxonomy is the diaper used to organize the mess of evolution into discrete packages" - M.Sandel




Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users