Jump to content


Photo

New Cichlasoma Species in Florida


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 rc6750

rc6750
  • NANFA Member
  • Tampa Bay, FL

Posted 15 January 2020 - 11:23 AM

Misidentified cichlids from central Florida have officially been identified as Cichlasoma dimerus instead of Cichlasoma bimaculatum

 

https://www.floridam...fish-corrected/

 

https://www.reabic.n...rectedproof.pdf

 

fishdistributionmap2-600x730.jpg



#2 bullhead

bullhead
  • NANFA Member
  • Wisconsin

Posted 15 January 2020 - 01:15 PM

I thought Cichlosoma has been invalidated as a genus?

 



#3 UncleWillie

UncleWillie
  • NANFA Member

Posted 16 January 2020 - 10:42 AM

Thanks for sharing that article.  It's nice to see the emphasis on the importance of citizen scientists and hobbyists collecting data, doing there own data, and reaching out to others in the field to answer questions or solve problems.


Willie P
Roswell, GA


#4 rc6750

rc6750
  • NANFA Member
  • Tampa Bay, FL

Posted 16 January 2020 - 01:39 PM

I thought Cichlosoma has been invalidated as a genus?

 

 

Cichlasoma is a valid genus. It used to be a catch all genus and had many, many species. Most of the species were kicked out during reclassification by Dr. Sven Kullander and others, but there are something like 15 or 16 species left that are valid.



#5 gerald

gerald
  • Global Moderator
  • Wake Forest, North Carolina

Posted 16 January 2020 - 03:04 PM

Purple dots = dimerus (Tampa & central FL);  Black dots = bimaculatum (south FL).  Ken Davis has compared the Tampa area "dimerus" with wild ones he collected in Uruguay and thinks the Tampa ones are not pure dimerus, but are hybrids.


Gerald Pottern
-----------------------
Hangin' on the Neuse
"Taxonomy is the diaper used to organize the mess of evolution into discrete packages" - M.Sandel





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users