Minnow and 2 darter id
#1 Guest_factnfiction101_*
Posted 16 July 2007 - 03:17 AM
Shiner
The darter my wife caught
The 3rd darter looks kinda like the small one my wife caught, except it was 5-6 inches long.
#2 Guest_fundulus_*
Posted 16 July 2007 - 07:21 AM
#3 Guest_factnfiction101_*
Posted 16 July 2007 - 08:31 AM
Here is a short video of them, if it helps. Also this is the Watershed it came from.The shiner photos are way too small for ID. The darter is some Percina species of darter, I'm not sure which with my first coffee just now appearing...
#4 Guest_fundulus_*
Posted 16 July 2007 - 08:50 AM
#5 Guest_factnfiction101_*
Posted 16 July 2007 - 09:10 AM
#6 Guest_Skipjack_*
Posted 16 July 2007 - 04:50 PM
I am not sure on your minnows, but either creek chub, stoneroller or blacknose dace. Better pics would allow for a better ID.
Edit: pretty sure after watching the video again that those are stonerollers. I am about 99% on the candy darter. Good find on the candy darter, you will have to go back there in the spring, and see them in their glory.
#7 Guest_fundulus_*
Posted 16 July 2007 - 06:54 PM
#8 Guest_Skipjack_*
Posted 16 July 2007 - 07:46 PM
I dunno, we might as well be reading a crystal ball for these IDs from available information. If we're talking about a large darter (pictured? not pictured?) logperch is the best bet; a smaller, colorful darter (picutured? not pictured?) candy darter is believable. The cyprinid(s) display a basicaudal spot and a thickened caudal peduncle; but is the mouth terminal or subterminal? Ain't no tellin'.
Believe that!
#9 Guest_factnfiction101_*
Posted 16 July 2007 - 07:54 PM
That would be cool if it is a candy darter (I know almost nothing about log perches), I've seen tons of them today. Most are exactly like the one in my tank, but I did see another big one today (looked almost exactly like the other). Today was a good day for darters, just couldn't catch any with my little dipnet.
I'll edit this post later with better pictures...
The darter picture didn't turn out very good, I forgot about how my camera focuses. I'll try and take one soon.
Here's a few of the darter:
#10 Guest_teleost_*
Posted 16 July 2007 - 08:21 PM
It's really not proper etiquette to take fish home and ask for an ID. You need to do one or all of the following:
Purchase/obtain from library a book adequate for your local identification needs. Your ID's should be done stream side. If your unsure about an ID, you should snap a photo and post it here (leave the fish in the water).
Possession of endangered fish can have serious penalties not to mention we want these fishes to thrive in the wild.
Even though endangered fish have this serious status, they're often locally common. Simply because a fish is easily obtained, should not make you feel comfortable about it's status.
Sorry for the lecture.
#11 Guest_Skipjack_*
Posted 16 July 2007 - 08:24 PM
I'm sorry about the pictures, I know they're almost worthless. The things is they have seemed very stressed, and I'm trying not to add to it. I'll take some better pictures of them tonight.
That would be cool if it is a candy darter (I know almost nothing about log perches), I've seen tons of them today. Most are exactly like the one in my tank, but I did see another big one today (looked almost exactly like the other). Today was a good day for darters, just couldn't catch any with my little dipnet.
I'll edit this post later with better pictures...
The darter picture didn't turn out very good, I forgot about how my camera focuses. I'll try and take one soon.
Well that there is a stoneroller. Now lets see the darter
#12 Guest_factnfiction101_*
Posted 16 July 2007 - 09:13 PM
I understand what you mean, and I don't mind the lecture at all. I'm new to natives, and you guys really know what you're talking about.I have much to say and not really sure how to go about it, but here goes.
It's really not proper etiquette to take fish home and ask for an ID. You need to do one or all of the following:
Purchase/obtain from library a book adequate for your local identification needs. Your ID's should be done stream side. If your unsure about an ID, you should snap a photo and post it here (leave the fish in the water).
Possession of endangered fish can have serious penalties not to mention we want these fishes to thrive in the wild.
Even though endangered fish have this serious status, they're often locally common. Simply because a fish is easily obtained, should not make you feel comfortable about it's status.
Sorry for the lecture.
I caught the small unknown darter almost 3 weeks ago. The big darter of the same species was caught and released two weeks ago. In my first post I confused myself, because I had caught a rainbow darter today and added him to the tank.
When the small unknown darter was caught I thought it was a female rainbow darter because of the lack of color. After I checked pictures of female rainbows again I still thought it was a female, it wasn't until I caught the bigger darter that I had doubts. I saw on the Nature Serv website that Rainbow darters don't grow that long. So that's what made me ask for an id of it.
As for the shiners (or so I thought), I thought they were common shiners. I thought that I would ask about them anyway, and to my surprise they weren't shiners at all.
I was also planning on buying that book you recommended in this topic. My local library doesn't have many books on fish, or the ones that I really liked were never returned I've been using Nature Serv and the photo gallery here for identification.
Before I collected any fish I checked on Nature Serv to make sure they didn't have a vunerable status, and I wrote the names of the fish down that I was interested in and fish that are vunerable. I think now I'll print the pictures of fish and take them with me.
I didn't know that. Feel free to tell me anything that I might have not thought about.Even though endangered fish have this serious status, they're often locally common. Simply because a fish is easily obtained, should not make you feel comfortable about it's status.
#13 Guest_iturnrocks_*
Posted 21 July 2007 - 12:11 AM
Before I collected any fish I checked on Nature Serv to make sure they didn't have a vunerable status
Does Nature Serv keep its fish section current? Every other animal Ive searched seems to be about 15 years late on its information.
#14 Guest_factnfiction101_*
Posted 21 July 2007 - 02:25 AM
I would think that they keep up to date information about fish species that are vunerable, extinct, etc...
Edit: I don't really know and I can't find out anything from the site. I think I might send them a e-mail about it. It would help me if you could remember what data was old. So I can put that in the e-mail.
#15 Guest_edbihary_*
Posted 22 July 2007 - 08:23 AM
The endangered/threatened statuses of fish (and other species, of course, as well) are updated by states without necessarily notifying NatureServe. It is their "responsibility" to keep themselves informed of these updates. You can't expect them to always be current. You should, however, be able to get the current list for your state from your state's web page. Don't depend on NatureServe; get the information directly from your state (or the state you will be collecting in), print it out, and keep it with you. And check periodically for updates.
#16 Guest_smbass_*
Posted 24 July 2007 - 11:39 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users