


Posted 19 August 2008 - 01:29 AM
Posted 19 August 2008 - 06:55 AM
Edited by centrarchid, 19 August 2008 - 06:57 AM.
Posted 19 August 2008 - 07:33 AM
Posted 19 August 2008 - 08:23 AM
Edited by natureman187, 19 August 2008 - 08:29 AM.
Posted 19 August 2008 - 09:20 AM
Posted 19 August 2008 - 09:48 AM
Posted 19 August 2008 - 10:21 AM
Posted 19 August 2008 - 10:22 AM
Posted 19 August 2008 - 11:00 AM
My ongoing skepticism is that we're interpreting naturally occuring variation as evidence of recent hybridization.
Edited by farmertodd, 19 August 2008 - 11:00 AM.
Posted 19 August 2008 - 11:36 AM
Posted 19 August 2008 - 12:24 PM
Posted 19 August 2008 - 01:06 PM
Bouncing off of what Todd said, maybe phenotypes change in massively altered stream systems with heightened turbidity and different nutrient status. Or, do all reproductive barriers break down and previously existing species become meaningless? That's the apocalyptic thought, maybe it's true. Or it's a parlor game of mixing and matching possible parents, jus' for fun.
Posted 19 August 2008 - 01:52 PM
A few papers documenting phenotypic plasticity are out there.Well, I think that's what Centrarchid is doing (the parlor game).
What I'm getting at is that hybridization is well documented, changing phenotype is not (at least in the fish lit). And until someone shows me patterned phenotypic response to distrubance while ruling out hybridization, I gotta go with what is in the evidence.
Todd
Posted 19 August 2008 - 03:19 PM
Posted 19 August 2008 - 05:26 PM
Posted 19 August 2008 - 08:36 PM
Posted 19 August 2008 - 09:27 PM
Posted 19 August 2008 - 09:42 PM
Posted 20 August 2008 - 07:56 AM
Posted 20 August 2008 - 08:02 AM
Also the last fish piucture before the habitat shots is also a hybrid, looks like a blugill x green sunfish. I think Mark had one of these in the tank with the first fish being discussed as well, not sure if it is the same fish as pictured though.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users