
Black Darters From North Alabama
#1
Guest_fundulus_*
Posted 10 November 2006 - 10:10 AM
#2
Guest_drewish_*
Posted 10 November 2006 - 10:51 AM
#3
Guest_fundulus_*
Posted 10 November 2006 - 03:25 PM
Nice looking fish. Were they used for a study or used for an ID collection?
I kept them as a voucher for that time of year in that stream. One of my students is doing a research project comparing black darter reproduction in two local streams in Limestone and Madison Counties, AL, and Swan Creek is in the same general area. One odd result we have so far is that the black darters in the two creeks are very different in size; the ones from a semi-eutrophic creek running through downtown Athens, AL, are much bigger than the blacks we collected in a cleaner rural stream in Madison County near the TN line. I'm waiting to see the reproductive efforts results tabulated, i.e. how many eggs they produce when in the spring, etc.
#4
Guest_nativecajun_*
Posted 09 December 2006 - 04:59 PM
#5
Guest_dsmith73_*
Posted 09 December 2006 - 07:53 PM
Interesting fish. Do these look somewhat like the Tennessee Snub Nose?
Almost exactly like as a matter of fact. Fundulus will have to explain the intricacies of these.
#6
Guest_ashtonmj_*
Posted 09 December 2006 - 10:03 PM
#7
Guest_nativecajun_*
Posted 10 December 2006 - 06:54 AM
#8
Guest_dsmith73_*
Posted 10 December 2006 - 09:36 AM
Just as a side, this is the way fish people talk a lot of the time. It is easier if we use more specific terminology to describe things. Just as I am certain there is a set of terms that deal with photography that get thrown around.
As a comment to your's Matt, I totally agree. I don't like the way so many species have been split based on arbitrary morphimetric markers. We can't always get a nuptual male to make a determination form, not can we always get a sample of DNA. I think fish should be readily IDable in the field based on good solid markers. I seem to be in a growing minority here though.
#9
Guest_ashtonmj_*
Posted 10 December 2006 - 11:30 AM
I consider simoterum and duryi to be more like 'clinal effect' seen in mussel species as they change forms from a headwater species to a medium stream to a large river. You can find multiple morphs sometimes at one site too. The Ulocentra species from the middle of the Duck River is a great example of this. There isn't even a consensus within aquatic species on how to define 'species'. With the the catspaw mussel, which is a species or subspecies depending on who you talk to, does not occur sympatrically that I know of, but is only seperated on the basis of the color of the inside of the shell. Well then why isn't Elliptio dilatata and Pleurobema sintoxia 3 species based on nacre color and even varying external morphology that can occur together and seperate. I guess I really just wish there was a wonderful week long taxonomy and systematics conference, everyone gets together, and says okay as of now unless we find a better way this is what we are ALL using as criteria acrossed all taxa the best way possible. Mussel taxonomy is absolutely destroyed and is in the process of taking a generation or two to fix the problems because there was no consensus.
Where is Collegedale Tennessee?
#10
Guest_fundulus_*
Posted 10 December 2006 - 10:42 PM
The one place where I'm certain I've seen sympatry between simoterum and duryi is in Hurricane Creek in the Walls of Jericho reserve. This is an upper tributary to the Paint Rock flowing out of Tennessee into Alabama, as Matt mentioned could be of some interest. I think the general breakdown would be simoterum is more typical in highland streams, and duryi is more typical of lowland streams with a direct connection to the Tennessee. This has been borne out in my experience of looking at lots of these darters from Limestone Creek in Madison County, AL, which I would describe as duryi based on the degree of lateral dorsal saddle fusion (especially in males) and the extent of the snout's "snubbing", and the same is true with fish from Town Creek in downtown Athens, AL, which I would also describe as all duryi for the same reasons. Both of these creeks also flow directly into the Tennessee. Does this mean that all lowland stream Ulocentras in my area are duryi? I'm not entirely certain, but it makes more sense to me. Brady Porter at Duquesne University has mentioned that in his experience Ulocentra species are not generally sympatric (he may have said something stronger). I tend to agree.
Exactly. I don't see fused blotches enough on the first specimen and a slightly broader snout to convince me it is a duryi and if I recall correctly they are found together in that area of Alabama which is I'm guessing Paint Rock or Flint river drainage into Guntersville. I totally understand why species in the Ulocentra subgenus like E. prryhogaster, etneri, flavum, others outside the TN drainage are solid species, but I just see duryi as ecomorphs or variation.
I consider simoterum and duryi to be more like 'clinal effect' seen in mussel species as they change forms from a headwater species to a medium stream to a large river. You can find multiple morphs sometimes at one site too. The Ulocentra species from the middle of the Duck River is a great example of this. There isn't even a consensus within aquatic species on how to define 'species'. With the the catspaw mussel, which is a species or subspecies depending on who you talk to, does not occur sympatrically that I know of, but is only seperated on the basis of the color of the inside of the shell. Well then why isn't Elliptio dilatata and Pleurobema sintoxia 3 species based on nacre color and even varying external morphology that can occur together and seperate. I guess I really just wish there was a wonderful week long taxonomy and systematics conference, everyone gets together, and says okay as of now unless we find a better way this is what we are ALL using as criteria acrossed all taxa the best way possible. Mussel taxonomy is absolutely destroyed and is in the process of taking a generation or two to fix the problems because there was no consensus.
Where is Collegedale Tennessee?
#11
Guest_nativecajun_*
Posted 11 December 2006 - 09:17 AM
#12
Guest_nativecajun_*
Posted 11 December 2006 - 09:29 AM
#13
Guest_dsmith73_*
Posted 11 December 2006 - 09:55 AM
I looked in my field guide and could not find a darter called black darter. Black sided darter I did find. A big solid black line down the side of it. Now did things change since my field guide was published, because it is quite old. And about those photos I believe it is only the Tennessee Snubnose that has that little "snubnose" that turns green in breeding colors and not the black sided. Now am I right about the black sided's name being changed or did I just overlook the black darter in my book. I did not take note on who explained all that terminology to me but thanks very much. I doub't I will learn all that stuff at my age but who knows miracles do happen LOL. And about the photography thing I suppose I could throw out quite a few words that most would not understand in the fish world. So appologies for that. Take care and merry Christmas to all and their families. Daniel
Even the most recent Peterson's guide is dated as far as many of the most recent splits are concerned. The snubnoses have been split a ton, down nearly to drainage. There is a new Peterson's coming out next year that should have all of these revisions in place. I would also suggest Etnier's Fishes of TN, which does a good job of classifying the snubnoses. The blacksided darter is a Percina sp. and looks very different from the Ulocentra snubnoses.
#14
Guest_ashtonmj_*
Posted 11 December 2006 - 09:55 AM
[quote name='nativecajun' date='Dec 11 2006, 02:29 PM' post='5791']
" Where is Collegedale Tennessee" someone asked. Well as you go through Chattanooga heading to Knoxville going east on I 75 and you get off on exit 11, that is Ooltewah Tennessee. Well Collegedale Tennessee is Just south and east a little "like they are almost one town"
I'll agree with 'generally' are not sympatric, but I don't know how much stronger you can go. There are at least 3 rivers I can think of off the top of my head where they are and one (the Duck) where things get really odd looking, and you have overlap beteween simoterum and flavum too. Then again, not all the Duck River is Highland, parts are Nashville Basin. Almost always exceptions and even exceptions to the exception.
When you describe your male female black darters Bruce it sorta leads one to the conclusion that if the female agrees with the traditional snubnose and a breeding male appears differently, that maybe we shouldn't be describing fish based on breeding male colors, which are extremes. Is lack of a frenum good enough to designate a species when there is overlap and possible/likely gene flow. That's like unattached or attached ear lobes. I'm just stoking the fire now in the context of a bigger topic

#15
Guest_dsmith73_*
Posted 11 December 2006 - 10:21 AM
#16
Guest_fundulus_*
Posted 11 December 2006 - 03:15 PM
You're right about a feature as seemingly trivial as a frenum or not. But there are real differences in breeding male coloration, and generally females respond to and mate with the "right" male. One of my graduate students is doing a project looking at reproductive effort and timing by two black darter (duryi) populations, from Limestone and Town Creeks that I mentioned before. I spent a lot of time looking at the individual fish as we captured and processed them last winter/spring to make sure that they were really, truly, black rather than Tennessee darters. They all lacked a frenum, and the males all pretty much looked like my photo at the top of this thread. But the females varied from a pronounced lateral black band, to ones who had dorsal saddles lightly connected by a lateral black band. I'm going with the interpretation that they're all duryi. I'm happy to do so because you would expect a range of variation in a population/species; individuals aren't genetically or phenotypically identical. So there's no such thing as an ideal black darter.
I should say that we're going to compare our black darters results to work by David Heins (Am. Midl. Nat. 145:74-79, 2001 I think) studying simoterum from Lawrence County in south Tennessee, not very far to the NW of here. It may well be the case that we'll find more differences between our two black darter populations than between them and the two Tennessee's; an interesting result to date is that one of our populations is significantly larger in standard length than the other. How this translates into average ova per female is still being calculated. But if I knew all the answers already it wouldn't be research, would it?
#17
Guest_TomNear_*
Posted 13 January 2007 - 10:23 AM
Also, I just want to clarify that snubnose darters have not been split out of other species, they just have been described since the 1980s. The story is that some ichthyologists were sitting on the describtions for decades (just like the current bridled darters in Percina) until Larry Page and Brooks Burr fired the first shot and described E. barrenense and E. rafinesquei. To think of them as split out of other speices is not accurate.
The frenum character, first illustrated by Dave Etnier, seems to work really well in identifying E. simoterum, relative to E. duryi and E. flavum.
We have a large scale darter DNA sequencing project up and running in our lab. If anyone would like to double check their identifications with some genetics, just send me an email and I can send you a tissue sampling kit.
thomas.near@yale.edu
Best-Tom Near
#18
Guest_fundulus_*
Posted 13 January 2007 - 11:21 AM
I have some insight on this isue that I can interject. E. duryi and E. simoterum are quite divergent when you consider how all of the snubnose darters are related to one another. All the genetic evidence presented to date indicates that the two species do not represent a cline. They are distinct lineages. For example, the snubnose darters most closely related to E. simoterum and E. atripinne (cumberland) are E. rafinesquei and E. barrenense.
Also, I just want to clarify that snubnose darters have not been split out of other species, they just have been described since the 1980s. The story is that some ichthyologists were sitting on the describtions for decades (just like the current bridled darters in Percina) until Larry Page and Brooks Burr fired the first shot and described E. barrenense and E. rafinesquei. To think of them as split out of other speices is not accurate.
The frenum character, first illustrated by Dave Etnier, seems to work really well in identifying E. simoterum, relative to E. duryi and E. flavum.
We have a large scale darter DNA sequencing project up and running in our lab. If anyone would like to double check their identifications with some genetics, just send me an email and I can send you a tissue sampling kit.
thomas.near@yale.edu
Best-Tom Near
Yeah, I remember seeing some of Brady Porter's mtDNA work showing surprising distance between duryi and simoterum, so it's not as easy as a clinal separation. Here in the southern bend of the Tennessee there seems to be a separation of the two species by habitat use as I've said before, with duryi as a lowland species and simoterum found in the highlands somewhat to the north, as evidenced by both frenum absence/presence and the less precise character of how solid a black lateral line is present. I'll probably take up Tom on his offer of genetic testing of individuals from some different streams to confirm my observations.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users