Congrats to NVCichlids!
#21 Guest_fishyz_*
Posted 30 November 2008 - 03:13 PM
#22 Guest_Mysteryman_*
Posted 01 December 2008 - 09:03 AM
On the other hand, I have noticed a lot of good natives coverage in AFI & FAMA over the past two years, so while it surprises me that an aquarist & AFI writer of some renown like Mike Wickham would say such things, I can say with some confidence that your article will have a better chance of seeing print in one of those other magazines. The pay is low, by the way, so don't do it for the money.
TFH is going to be running a big article on many of the fishes of the southeast soon, written by that Stan Sung guy, a regular TFH writer. Bruce can tell you much more about it than I can, since Stan visited him while writing it. While that is good news, it also means that TFH already knows it's planning a big natives article from one of their favorite pet writers, and thusly probably won't be as likely to want another one. Again, AFI is your better bet.
I'm just a shining ray of hope, aren't I? Still, if TFH gets a lot of article submissions about natives, then who knows... maybe they'll start to figure out that natives are more popular than they think, eh? By all means, give it a try. Good luck!
#23 Guest_fishyz_*
Posted 02 December 2008 - 09:18 PM
I might try a different magazine then. I just hope Stan Sung's is good.
#24 Guest_critterguy_*
Posted 03 December 2008 - 12:42 PM
Edited by critterguy, 03 December 2008 - 12:42 PM.
#25 Guest_fishyz_*
Posted 03 December 2008 - 04:34 PM
#26 Guest_critterguy_*
Posted 03 December 2008 - 09:20 PM
P. welaka(perhaps fortunately since CB is not exactly common right now) is not commercially available. Period.(short of going to collect them yourself or getting them from someone who does)
#27 Guest_fishyz_*
Posted 04 December 2008 - 09:53 PM
#28 Guest_Irate Mormon_*
Posted 10 December 2008 - 10:50 PM
#29 Guest_sandtiger_*
Posted 11 December 2008 - 01:56 PM
TFH used to be bad about paying you for articles and then sitting on them The pay about the same as the other guys. I haven't written any articles in a LOT of years so the situation may have changed.
They actually did that with my last article, sent the contract and then the check and waited several months before publishing it (for those interested; Goldfish Myths, January 2009). I've written four articles for TFH, two of them concerning natives. Not surprisingly they've published both the articles concerning typical aquarium fish (catfishes and goldfish) but nether of the ones on natives. They've told me they're interested and intend on sending out contracts but the one I wrote on largemouth bass I sent out about a year ago and nothing has become of it yet.
The only article I ever sent to AFI was the goldfish one I mentioned before, after a couple months of no response from them I sent it on to TFH instead.
#30 Guest_fishyz_*
Posted 21 December 2008 - 04:08 PM
#31 Guest_Irate Mormon_*
Posted 21 December 2008 - 10:28 PM
#32 Guest_fishyz_*
Posted 23 December 2008 - 07:15 PM
Ok. Thanks Irate!No, actually it's quite easy. It's just that TFH has this little idiosyncrasy. I guess these magazines really NEED writers, because they never turned down any of mine. That show how desperate they are! There are also UK publications that you might write for. I always liked A&P.
#33 Guest_NVCichlids_*
Posted 20 July 2011 - 09:50 AM
#34 Guest_Irate Mormon_*
Posted 22 July 2011 - 11:59 PM
Wow, I know this is old, but I didn't even know this topic was started. I have actually written a couple of articles for them and told them they could use them for free, just acknowledge I wrote them and nothing ever happened.
The first article I ever wrote - I didn't know if anybody would publish it, so I submitted it to 3 magazines, simultaneously. They ALL accepted it, so I was in rather a bind. I had to apologize to two editors.
I particularly favored FAMA because I liked Don Dewey. His passing was a great loss.
That was a long time ago. I don't have the inclination to write anymore.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users