body builder trout
#1 Guest_FirstChAoS_*
Posted 04 April 2010 - 12:17 AM
I normally have no problem with the idea of genetically modifying food but I find these trout a bit freakish, not only for their monstrous looking body, but also because they remind me of the fish version of the very very inbred breeds of cat and dog who in order to reach a ever strict breed standard become both hideously deformed and riddled with health problems. I know they are genetically altered and not inbred (hopefully) but still the exaggeration of a trait to the point of it being ugly and possibly harmful to the individual is the same in both cases.
#2 Guest_donkeyman876_*
Posted 04 April 2010 - 07:15 AM
#3 Guest_centrarchid_*
Posted 04 April 2010 - 07:16 AM
If you consume an intensively reared chicken (most Americans do), then you already consume a "double muscled" product. Selective breeding was done to create the cornish x white rock cross but end result was same. The genetic manipulation of the two species are not the problem, it is the feeds they are fed and with poultry, the anti-biotics in particular. That is why over time I hope to raise most of the animal protein I consume using organic methods.
#4 Guest_nativeplanter_*
Posted 05 April 2010 - 02:06 PM
#5 Guest_centrarchid_*
Posted 05 April 2010 - 03:05 PM
The method used by poultry breeders was done by a lower tech method and no interspecies exchanges made during final developmental stages.
As for the "Plus, broiler hens aren't about to escape and start breeding with wild counterparts", that is total male bovine fecal matter. Poultry lines selected for performance under intensified production in India can and do cross with wild Red Jungle Fowl (wild jungle do not exist in wild of U.S.), although at a rate less than known for less derived breeds. It is to the point that "pure" red jungle fowl stocks are difficult to find. If predator and other natural risks factors were allowed to be expressed, then introgession of domesticated genotypes would likley slow.
Also if you take some mutant barred x cornish cross brids and put them on a an island withou predators, I will bet good money they would be able found a viable population. The cross does set and rear chicks, despite being physically handicapped. Different story if high performance egg-laying breeds used which do not set.
Now that I erroneously proved your point, here is mine.
As for the trout, there will be intermediate stages where they will be able to breed with wild kin, but at some point the domesticated animals will become like domesticated white turkeys that cannot self propogate without lots of culturist's intervention. Then stocks can be raised in close proximity with minimal risks, at least from introgression. That is my goal with broadly related work.
Also the gene products associated with enhanced muscling (those from other species), do they make up a biologically / nutrtionally significant component of the consumed product? I thought most regulatory in nature.
#6 Guest_nativeplanter_*
Posted 05 April 2010 - 03:41 PM
Regarding the second point, sure, if you put anything on an isolated island with perfect conditions and no predators, they might be able to establish a viable population. But barring those conditions, I think it is exceptionally unlikely that a self-sustaining population is possible. Broiler fowl are extraordinarily handicapped. I have kept both broilers and layers; layers are much better adapted. The barred x cornish cross as an adult has a difficulty with mobility, as well as general constitution. Even the younger birds have problems - for example, broilers suffer from a conditions called flip-over disease, in which, due to their particular carriage and eating habits, suddenly flip over and die. The condition is also known as acute or sudden death syndrome. Prevention consists of lowered lighting regimes to keep the birds calm, and feed restriction.
My comments aren't intended toward the freaking-out-from-grotesque-musculature issue; we eat all kinds of things that some might consider aesthetically appalling. I merely meant to point out that the trout and broilers weren't quite the same issue here in North America. Their crossing with jungle fowl is my point exactly - wild populations can be affected. I'd hate to see a point in time when we can not find "pure" wild trout populations. I don't quite feel as confident as you that "at some point the domesticated animals will become like domesticated white turkeys that cannot self propogate without lots of culturist's intervention". That future is too difficult to predict in my opinion.
#7 Guest_centrarchid_*
Posted 05 April 2010 - 04:10 PM
#8 Guest_Rtifs_*
Posted 06 April 2010 - 11:56 AM
#9 Guest_nativeplanter_*
Posted 09 April 2010 - 12:12 PM
If efforts are intentional, then developing barriers to hybridization should be possible. The future will be diificult to predict if we make no plans for it and act as if we have no control, especially in respect to our food supplies.
Agreed and agreed. Careful planning with all aspects to our existence on this planet is paramount in my opinion. Whether it be food supplies, water availability, temperature (which, in addition to the popular concerns, can greatly affect both food supplies and water availability), energy, biological resources, and on and on. In addition (although I have not done any studying of the matter and could be quite wrong) I am of the opinion that most wars have erupted over resources. We forget that spatial shifts in resource availability can and often lead to war (an always horrible consequence).
My concern is that most agencies/organizations/people tinkering with genetics do not adequately consider the need for hybridization barriers. Issues stemming from pollen drift are an excellent example of this in plants. The inserted genes definetly do move about and unintentionally fertilize nearby plants, and plants don't even move! I would think that animals would be of even greater concern, especially those for which there are wild analogues.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users