Jump to content


ph


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 Guest_CaptainCritter_*

Guest_CaptainCritter_*
  • Guests

Posted 08 February 2012 - 08:12 PM

Currently my ph is about 6.8 to about 7.2 after my weekly 50 % water change with water straight from the tap treated with Stress Coat + ( no RO/DI, etc.) I have 2 Common Shiners, 2 Blacknose Dace, 5 Banded Killifish, 4 Banded Sunfish, and 4 Dollar Sunfish in my 75 gallon tank. Zero ammonia, nitrites, nitrates. I use Tetra Blackwater Extract and have a bag of sphagnum peat moss in one of my filters to make the water slightly acidic. Is this needed ? The fish have been healthy, disease free, and are ravenous feeders. Could I keep some of the darter, madtom, or more southern species of shiners as my water parameters currently are or do they need to be more alkaline ?

#2 Guest_Yeahson421_*

Guest_Yeahson421_*
  • Guests

Posted 08 February 2012 - 09:32 PM

PH isn't much of an issue with natives. Even fish from the incredibly acidic Okefenokee adapt well to more regular PHs.

#3 Guest_fundulus_*

Guest_fundulus_*
  • Guests

Posted 08 February 2012 - 10:05 PM

River water from north Alabama has these parameters: TDS of ~170 ppm, pH 6.8 - 7.6, alkalinity of 25 - 40 meq of carbonate. It's well-buffered because of widespread limestone karst.

#4 Guest_EricaWieser_*

Guest_EricaWieser_*
  • Guests

Posted 08 February 2012 - 10:14 PM

Zero ammonia, nitrites, nitrates.

Red flag, nitrate should never be at 0 ppm. Even the most heavily planted tank should hover around 10 ppm, otherwise the plants are starving. Ammonia and nitrite at 0 ppm is typical and healthy for a cycled tank, but there is no shame in having a nitrate concentration even as high as 30 ppm. If your test kit honestly did read zero ppm then you can't trust it and might want to buy a new one.


PH isn't much of an issue with natives. Even fish from the incredibly acidic Okefenokee adapt well to more regular PHs.

The pH matters when breeding certain species of native fish. For example one Okefenokee swamp species, Leptolucania ommata, won't spawn until the pH drops below 6. So if you're trying to breed native fish then yes, for some species pH might matter.
For a non-breeding community tank like CaptainCritter wants: yes, in general darters, madtoms, and shiners do well at your pH of 6.8 or 7.2. That is actually dead average, neither acidic nor basic. There is no reason to change or attempt to modify your pH at all, CaptainCritter. The peat moss is unnecessary for your fish species.

Just remember to drip acclimate whenever you're moving fish from one water to another, and you'll be fine.
Here's a video to demonstrate the technique:


If you drip acclimate them, most fish make it even if the pH, DH, and temperature are very different from what they came from. The downside is that drip acclimation takes hours and hours. But it's worth it because the fish survive.

Once, back when my water was hard and alkaline, I bought 20 neon tetras from a pet store, tossed them in my tank, and every single one was dead by the end of the day. A year later I tried it again and drip acclimated them for five hours. I didn't lose a single one. Drip acclimation can really overcome pH differences so that they don't shock the fish. *nods*

Edited by EricaWieser, 08 February 2012 - 10:26 PM.


#5 Guest_ashtonmj_*

Guest_ashtonmj_*
  • Guests

Posted 09 February 2012 - 07:23 AM

Aquarium water quality is one of the biggest red herrings when it comes to native fish. I have done one water change of more than 20% in my current take in the last three years and that was to move it and I have had rainbow darter for 4 years and a bantam sunfish male that has tried to spawn three springs in a row. I rarely change the filter almost never vacuum the substrate and feed quite heavily. Guess what, the water you drink comes from the water they live in. If they can't live in the water chances are you shouldn't be drinking it. I've also never wasted a dollar in my life on a test kit.

#6 Guest_gerald_*

Guest_gerald_*
  • Guests

Posted 09 February 2012 - 11:02 AM

I dont measure much, but I do check pH in soft-water tanks. My tap water has very low buffering and pH can plunge into the 4's if I'm not careful. That will definitely kill shiners and darters that are not swamp-adapted species. In most of my native tanks I add crushed coral gravel in the filter to prevent pH crash, but I also have some tropical blackwater fish that I keep soft and mildly acidic without crushed coral - those tanks I test.

Regarding Matt's no-water-change strategy, sometimes that works especially if the same fish have lived together for years and you rarely add new fish. But IME, in general, fish are more likely to get sick if you never change water, and new wild-caught shiners and darters placed in old dirty water might not acclimate well. Redbelly dace and Percina and Nothonotus darters in particular seem prone to getting emaciated and lose vigor in old water with high nitrate and other waste build-up.

#7 Guest_Markart_*

Guest_Markart_*
  • Guests

Posted 09 February 2012 - 01:20 PM

A reasonably stable pH is more important than actual reading (avoiding extremes) in my experience. My tap water is bang on neutral but has very little buffering, as a result I'm always wary of a crash. To combat (in a similar technique to gerald) I have Tufa rock slowly dissolving in my external filter. I hardly ever test and then only pH.

I've read of no water change policies for certain planted tanks, but would never consider this approach in 99.9% of aquaria. For me water changes are a must for any fish.

#8 Guest_CaptainCritter_*

Guest_CaptainCritter_*
  • Guests

Posted 09 February 2012 - 08:30 PM

Thanks for the input everybody, going to remove the peat moss tomorrow and get a new nitrate test kit.

#9 Guest_rickwrench_*

Guest_rickwrench_*
  • Guests

Posted 10 February 2012 - 05:24 AM

My tap water has very low buffering and pH can plunge into the 4's if I'm not careful.

Back when I believed in test kits, I had a few very heavily planted, soft water tanks (not CO2 enriched) that would test pretty low (6.0 - 6.2) in the mornings due to nighttime plant O2 respiration. But by evening, ph would have crept back up into the mid 7's as the CO2 (carbonic acid) was all used up by the plants. With minimal buffering, the diurnal CO2 swing can really move the ph up and down. The fish in those aquariums thrived for several years.
Ph itself is rarely the fish killer, rather the sudden changes in general and carbonate hardness (aka, conductivity) are the root cause of the stress/shock when transporting fish home. This is why the "drip method" for acclimatizing fish works. Not because the ph levels are slowly reaching an equilibrium, but because the water's hardness is.

A ph test doesn't really tell you much of anything, by itself. The relationship between hardness and CO2 is what controls ph. Say your tank's ph is 7.0. Great, what does that mean? If your KH is 10, it means your fish are on the verge of suffocating, if your KH is 2, your tank's plants have used up most of the available CO2, and the water is probably O2 saturated.
In a healthy planted tank, soft or not, sudden downward ph swings are caused by a big boost of CO2 from somewhere, usually decaying matter, like a hidden dead fish.

I've read of no water change policies for certain planted tanks, but would never consider this approach in 99.9% of aquaria. For me water changes are a must for any fish.

400+ gallons of captive water in many tanks here, and no water changes in years.
It depends on how committed you are to creating a truly balanced aquarium (not a "fishtank"). High plant mass and a live, healthy substrate (dirt, or capped dirt), will happily consume all waste produced by a modest amount of critter life. Also, they will absorb and lock up all of the inevitable build up of chemicals and metals from evaporated water replacement. Over the course of a heavily planted tank's life, you remove the same impurities that multiple water changes would have removed as you trim/prune the plants, which have been busy doing their job growing, filtering and consuming NO3/4, sequestering other contaminants. They do such a good job, that eventually (couple/3/4 years) they will burn through all nutrients available in the tank's substrate, despite the supplemental plant nutrient supplied via fish waste, and you will notice some of the plant species in the tank will "stall", for lack of a better word. Time to rebuild.
Heavily planted, means just that, too. Not three sprigs of elodia, 4" of anubias rhizome, and a 2" potted sword.
My BBS aquarium.
My Bluespotted sunfish aquarium.

As the years go by, the water will become progressively softer. The softer the water, the bigger the potential daily ph swings from plant CO2 production/absorbtion, just like a pond. Some plants are better than others at filtering. Vals seem to remove carbonates faster than most other plant I've kept. Egeria densa also is a carbonate gobbler. Water lettuce sucks up metals so well it can starve your other plants of required trace metals.

The CO2 produced by fish respiration is negligible in the kh/ph/CO2 equation, btw.
Many years ago, I boxed up all my test kits, sold my CO2 enrichment equipment, and decided to let the plants, fish, snails, etc., tell me what's going on in the aquarium. Much more rewarding to me to trim once every month or so, and do nothing else but feed the fish and enjoy the tanks.


Rick

Edited by rickwrench, 10 February 2012 - 05:28 AM.


#10 Michael Wolfe

Michael Wolfe
  • Board of Directors
  • North Georgia, Oconee River Drainage

Posted 10 February 2012 - 09:16 AM

It depends on how committed you are to creating a truly balanced aquarium (not a "fishtank"). High plant mass and a live, healthy substrate (dirt, or capped dirt), will happily consume all waste produced by a modest amount of critter life.

You're my hero... and I do not want to derail this, but just to clarify and put some specific numbers to your definition of balanced... how many Enneacanthus sunfish do you have in each of those aquaria and how large are they?

I have a no filter, no algae, do nothing 25 gallon with lots of plants and only one Enneacanthus that is aligned with your above statements.
Either write something worth reading or do something worth writing. - Benjamin Franklin

#11 Guest_rickwrench_*

Guest_rickwrench_*
  • Guests

Posted 14 February 2012 - 12:21 AM

how many Enneacanthus sunfish do you have in each of those aquaria and how large are they?


I guess this thread has petered out a bit so I'll hijack it with the reply if nobody minds.

The BBS tank had three BBS (since traded away), two female flagfish, snails. It's 33 gallons (same footprint as a 29 just taller), Substrate = sprinkle of osmokote, 2-3" dirt, capped with 1" EcoComplete. For water movement, it has a Rena single basket canister filter, the basket is filled with coarse gravel only. No heater, no air pump. Plants are; vals, hygro diformis, anubias barteri v. nana. and some foreground plant that I can't remember. Lights are on 11 hours a day, straight through. This tank has been running for 4+ years now and is burned out. The vals are all stunted (still green, but only about 10" tall), and the other plants are stalled. I'm temporarily using it to house 4 small (>3") longears until I get another big tank set up and rolling. The vals did perk up a little with the increased fish load, but it needs a complete teardown/rebuild.

The Bluespotted tank (actually a refugee tank) has three small >2" bluespots, one male flagfish, one red eye tetra, one huge bronze cory, one brushy nose pleco. It's 29 gallons (a garage sale tank), sprinkle of osmokote, 2" of dirt capped with creek sand. Water movement is from a small power head with a coarse foam pre-filter to keep snails from clogging up the works. Since this tank is a refugee tank I keep it at 78f. Lights on 10 hours a day, straight through.
The tank has a massive amount of leaf surface. Despite the fact that the plants are all "slow growing" anubias (4 varieties), and the fish load is what I'd normally consider too high for a heavily planted filterless tank, the tank is always crystal clear.

However, my views on fish load have recently been given a small jolt...

I gave my nephew a rebuilt 20g Metaframe last year for his 10th birthday (his parents were thrilled! ;) ). I retrofitted a 36w(?) CF into the original hood. Set up a timer for 10 hours of light, straight through. I made him do all the setup, hardscape, and planting. I offered helpful suggestions (and reasons behind them), but he did all the work while I nursed a beer. His substrate is 2-3" of backyard dirt (Mom!!! Where's the shovel?"), capped with 1" of EcoComplete. I harvested and brought over a pile of vals, H. diformis, some microsword, an anubias barteri v. barterei, one big sword, some java moss. He filled it, planted it, set up the the powerhead. No air pump, of course. He wanted "colorful" fish that he could get with his allowance. I told him to wait a few weeks, let the snails and blackworms (about a spoonful) get going, maybe drop a few grass shrimp in after a couple days (dirt tanks cycle -very- quickly). On the next visit I gave him some a pair of wild strain sailfin mollies (one was melanistic), a big male flagfish, some extra redwag platty fry, and a stainless steel heater (78f).
As set up, and this is about the -minimum- plant density I would ever consider starting with:
Posted Image

Too plain I guess, he picked up a few more platties, sailfins, a pleco, some neons, a couple other tetras. The next time I saw the tank, I thought it was quite overloaded with fish, and expected it to crash in short order.
However, a year has gone by, and the tank looks great:
Posted Image

Took the above shot last week. The water is crystal clear, plants are booming, fish, snails, shrimp are healthy. Didn't see any blackworms, but I'm sure they are there.

He prunes every month or so, mostly vals. Gives away the sailfin and platty fry. The micro sword is gone, as is most of the H. diformis. The vals are going gangbusters though.
I have not helped him, other than to troubleshoot the clogged powerhead over the phone (snails committed mass suicide in the impeller, solved by adding a coarse foam pre-filter). It's been -his- to run.
He just turned 11. If a 10 year old can run a heavily planted filterless tank, overload it with fish and keep it looking good all by himself, -anybody- can.

If you had asked me last year how many fish a filterless, heavily planted tank could support without problems, I'd have said about an inch of fish for every five gallons. After seeing his run so successfully for the last year with as many fish as it has in it (20+?), I'm not so sure any more.

Rick

#12 Guest_Markart_*

Guest_Markart_*
  • Guests

Posted 18 February 2012 - 11:37 AM

400+ gallons of captive water in many tanks here, and no water changes in years.
It depends on how committed you are to creating a truly balanced aquarium (not a "fishtank"). High plant mass and a live, healthy substrate (dirt, or capped dirt), will happily consume all waste produced by a modest amount of critter life.



You've hit the nail on the head here Rick. Of the millions of tanks out there how many have a plant mass sufficient to leave off water changes? That was my point, I wasn't in any way denying your experience, as I mentioned the technique is well known amongst experienced aquarists. The 'balanced' aquariums you mention are great but I want to re-create a habitat, I wouldn't keep Malawis (for instance) in a plant heavy tank. It would be, inevitably, just a 'fish tank' and non the worse for it.

I got some food for thought here too, I'm planning a well planted Stickleback tank this year and your posts have certainly given me some ideas, thanks for sharing.

#13 Guest_CaptainCritter_*

Guest_CaptainCritter_*
  • Guests

Posted 05 April 2012 - 04:27 PM

Actually I gave my nephew a 10 gallon tank for his birthday 2 years ago that is heavily planted with crypt's and val and its doing great. I do a 50% water change bi-monthly. He's got about 20 guppies and 4 cherry barbs in there with no fish loss at all from water issues. He recently put a small Clawed Frog in there much to my chagrin :(




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users