Jump to content


Photo

Luciae in the Saltmarsh with Diamonds


4 replies to this topic

#1 gerald

gerald
  • Global Moderator
  • Wake Forest, North Carolina

Posted 04 February 2016 - 05:54 PM

A 2013 paper by Michael Ghedotti and Matthew Davis reexamines the phylogeny of Fundulus killifishes using both genetic and morphological characters, and the evolution of salinity adaptation among this group.  Some of their interesting phylogeny conclusions are:

 

The Diamond Killifish (Adinia xenica) is most closely related to the Spotfin Killifish (Fundulus luciae); so the genus Adinia is synonymized back into Fundulus (F. xenicus).  The sister group to the Luciae + Diamond pair is … you guessed it …. F. chrysotus!  (That wasn’t your guess?  Me neither).

 

The other species that look and behave more like chrysotus (rubrifrons, cingulatus, sciadicus) are on the “Zygonectes branch” containing the five “Starhead group” species and three “Notatus group” species.  The Diamond/ luciae +Chrysotus branch joins the tree just below the Starhead +Notatus branch.

 

The two west coast Fundulus (F. lima and parvipinnis) are related to F. zebrinus + kansae.  The branch supporting those two groups is basal to the Zygonectes branch.

 

On the other side of the phylogentic tree, basal to those two groups, are all the remaining Fundulus: the studfish and most of the marine/brackish species (other than luciae, xenicus, lima, parvipinnis).  There are some phylogenetic surprises on that side too:

 

The Speckled Killifish (F. rathbuni), traditionally grouped with studfish in a subgenus “Xenisma” is placed on the branch with the Banded Killifish (F. diaphanus) and its cousins in Lake Waccamaw and Lake Phelps.  The rest of the Studfishes join below that branch.

 

The Banded group + Studfish group branch is a sister group to the Mummichogs and Marsh killies (grandis, heteroclitus, confluentus and kin), and below that fork they join with the final branch containing majalis, similis, and seminolis.

 

The proposed new phylogenetic tree of Fundulus is on page 44 of the Ghedotti and Davis paper.  This link below requires a Bioone subscription --  not a free download.

 

Fieldiana Life and Earth Sciences Number 7 :1-65. 2013
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3158/2158-5520-12.7.1

Phylogeny, Classification, and Evolution of Salinity Tolerance of the North American Topminnows and Killifishes, Family Fundulidae (Teleostei: Cyprinodontiformes)  -- Michael J. Ghedotti and Matthew P. Davis  (2013)


Gerald Pottern
-----------------------
Hangin' on the Neuse
"Taxonomy is the diaper used to organize the mess of evolution into discrete packages" - M.Sandel


#2 Doug_Dame

Doug_Dame
  • NANFA Member

Posted 05 February 2016 - 06:57 AM

Darn I miss working at a university facility where I had academic access to these kinds of papers via the online library.

 

But an excellent summary, thanks Gerald !


Doug Dame

Floridian now in Cincinnati
 


#3 zooxanthellae

zooxanthellae
  • NANFA Member
  • North Carolina

Posted 05 February 2016 - 09:06 AM

Very succinct review Gerald, that was a lot of paper to get through! The two that really stood out for me were the (luciae/diamond)/chrysotus taxon and the rathbuni/diaphanus taxon. I never would have guessed at either of those. I will disagree with their f. confluentus range though! 



#4 gerald

gerald
  • Global Moderator
  • Wake Forest, North Carolina

Posted 05 February 2016 - 10:34 AM

Mostly I just looked at the pretty pictures (alternative phylogeny trees).  Have not plodded through the cranial morphology part (probably wont) and not yet plodded through the salinity evolution part (might if I can find time).


Gerald Pottern
-----------------------
Hangin' on the Neuse
"Taxonomy is the diaper used to organize the mess of evolution into discrete packages" - M.Sandel


#5 zooxanthellae

zooxanthellae
  • NANFA Member
  • North Carolina

Posted 05 February 2016 - 11:52 AM

Have not plodded through the cranial morphology part (probably wont) 

 

I may have just brushed past that section myself. I wouldn't wish that on my worst enemy. 





Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users