Three New Darters Described
#1 Guest_AC-Editor_*
Posted 15 August 2007 - 09:31 AM
PDF of full paper is available here:
http://www.mapress.c...zt01549p028.pdf
NANFA checklist updated here:
http://nanfa.org/checklist.shtml
Chris Scharpf
NANFA
#2 Guest_farmertodd_*
Posted 15 August 2007 - 01:59 PM
Nice stuff, thanks for posting it Chris.
My one regret from my dive on the Conasauga this spring was that I didn't take time to get any stills. Guess I'll have to go back
Todd
#3 Guest_Irate Mormon_*
Posted 16 August 2007 - 10:52 PM
Two of the three species, P. kusha and P. sipsi, are considered to be imperiled species and are in need of conservation actions to prevent their extinction.
What, already?!
#4 Guest_edbihary_*
Posted 18 August 2007 - 08:20 AM
#5 Guest_farmertodd_*
Posted 18 August 2007 - 10:03 AM
So, the bridled darters are really an exception, even when everyone is trying to work on the most imperilled species. Then again, so is most everything in the Mobile Bay drainage. If Metee or someone updates his text in 15 years, that book will be twice as thick. You can get a good idea of what the difference is in comparing Metee against all the cf sp. accounts in Mayden and Boschung.
What's the ethical thing to do with all this going on in the background? If you don't know what something is, take a picture and release it. No one needs any fish
Todd
#6 Guest_edbihary_*
Posted 18 August 2007 - 12:22 PM
That's really what I was trying to say. Thanks for helping out and wording it more clearly.What's the ethical thing to do with all this going on in the background? If you don't know what something is, take a picture and release it. No one needs any fish
#7 Guest_Irate Mormon_*
Posted 19 August 2007 - 09:43 PM
Some thing with N. longirostris - common as dirt but definitely not quite the same as longirostris.
#8 Guest_farmertodd_*
Posted 20 August 2007 - 07:38 AM
I knew there was something different about those silverjaws I get around here.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users