This particular Russian experiment breed for flight distance. It turns out the same genes involved in flight distance also code for maturity in many respects. So just by breeding for low flight distance also entails that canines never mature beyond those of puppies in some ways. This refutes the traditional notion that many of the domestic traits in dogs today was the result of refinements over many years of domestication. As most of these domestication traits are the result of breeding for a single trait.This is an interesting topic. I was reading an article in the latest issue of National Geographic about a Russian project over the last 50 years to domesticate the silver fox through through selective breeding. The theory is that domestication is based in genetics. The fun part is that they now have foxes that are every bit as gentle and playful as labrador retrievers.
Harry Knaub
You can not depend on the same connections between traits in other species. What gerald relayed from old timers about cichlids indicates possibly the opposite effect in cichlids. Where low flight distance results in more aggressive behavior, rather than less. Gene interactions are not are not that consistent across species, and depends heavily on the traits being optimized for the survival of a given species in the natural environment. For fish what is feared wants to eat you and what is not feared is food. Hence losing the fear of being eaten results in perusing what is not feared for food.
This may not be the case for gilberti, as their food does not generally consist of other fish. Though they are still predators there is no reason, unlike many predatory fish, for them to suddenly become overly aggressive to other fish they do not fear, as these fish have never been a viable food source to them.