Saw a fish, think it was a gar!
Posted 12 October 2009 - 10:54 AM
Posted 13 October 2009 - 10:23 AM
Edited by Kurisuchan, 13 October 2009 - 10:27 AM.
Posted 13 October 2009 - 03:45 PM
spots, sharp teeth, long snout We still need a pic of the actual fish, whether it be a shilouette or of the fish doing its thing in the water, otherwise we are simply being theoretical and simply continuing the debate
Edited by panfisherteen, 13 October 2009 - 03:46 PM.
Posted 03 November 2009 - 02:51 AM
Edited by catfish_hunter, 03 November 2009 - 02:53 AM.
Posted 04 November 2009 - 01:48 AM
yea that gar wont be back until next year in mid-late spring (if it survives the winter, depending on species it could). LMAO!!! to the wild pumpkinseed and bluegills eating the pellets
That was insane, they didn't even hesitate to eat it, it was like baby food trained trout at a hatchery, if you've seen that it looks like reversed raining. But then again, mine are from Hayden Lake and nobody often tosses bread to ducks and fish at Hayden Lake.
Posted 19 November 2009 - 11:20 PM
Yep, someone put them in the pond. I believe he said they were longnoses.
Then why has no one heard about it? This should have been reported. Unless your source was overtly incompetent or ignorant that should have been reported and promptly.
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users